"Unity without verity is no better than conspiracy." - John Trapp

Monday, May 29, 2006

Thoughts on Trinitarianism

As we become a more spiritual, but less Christian (at least in the Biblical/historic sense), nation there is a lessened emphasis on doctrine. This takes many forms, from Open Theism and their denial of God's knowledge of future events to the some churches and/or their leaders denying that there is universal, objective truth. One particular such change has been a growing trend that rejects the doctrine of the Trinity. In classical liberalism this was done by denying Jesus' deity, but many professing evangelicals today are denying the Trinity by rejecting the distinction of the persons within the Godhead.

Given the general track of society, maybe it is suprising this did not occur sooner. In the evengelical church at large there has long been a noticeable lack of teaching of doctrine in general, and the doctrine of the Trinity in particular. Preaching has tended to focus on more practical matters, like becoming a better leader, unlocking our internal potential, or finding our purpose. The church has had little time for such esoteric doctrines like the Trinity that have little impact on how we live our daily lives.

Of course, this is a false assumption. How and what we think about God affects every aspect of our lives, but generally at a level below our purposeful living. John Calvin, after the introductory material, starts his "Institutes of the Christian Religion" with the statement, "Our wisdom, in so far as it ought to be deemed true and solid Wisdom, consists almost entirely of two parts: the knowledge of God and of ourselves." Calvin goes on to argue that the two (knowledge of self and knowledge of God) are so linked as to make it nearly impossible to separate. (It is worth noting that Calvin saw the "Institutes" not primarily as a theological text book, but a handbook for Christian living.)

Therefore, having a correct understanding of who God is will enable us to have a greater understanding of who we are. Whether God exists as one person from eternity that has revealed Himself in different ways or He exists as three persons, co-equal, all fully divine, all truly God has a great impact on the nature of all existence. Also, how we view Him will have an impact on how we live in and percieve the world. If God is a Trinity, then all of existence is relationship. The very nature of being is bound up in personal interaction. Statements such as "It is not good for man to be alone" take on a much clearer significance, since "alone" and "exist" are not compatible terms.

Other considerations include the nature of the atonement, and the distinct roles that each person in the Trinity fulfill in bringing salvation to mankind (see Ephesians 1:1-14 to see how Paul discusses how each member of the Trinity works in our salvation). As churches we do not preach and teach on the Trinity in part because we do not preach and teach the Scriptures. If we did so, we would have to deal with passages like Ephesians 1:1-14 and then discuss the Trinity.

The argument that the Trinity is too difficult a topic is irrelevent. Any topic that truly deals with who God is will be too difficult for us. We are finite creatures trying to comprehend God. We will fall short. But God has revealed Himself to us and we should strive to understand what we can, knowing at the end we will have to declare that the mystery is too deep for us. We can no more understand how God can exists as one God in Three Persons than we can understand how Jesus can be fully human and fully divine. At the end of our theology there will always be (should always be) humility, awe, and a willingness to accept the limits of our knowledge. After all, God has told us that we will never know it all, "The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but the things that are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law." (Deuteronomy 29:29 ESV).

Let us strive to know God to the full extent He has revealed Himself to us, particularly in the person and work of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Saturday, May 06, 2006

First Attempt

In the now infamous words, here goes nothing.

This looks pretty simple, but given my history, I can mess anything up. If this works out, I'll be posting thoughts from time to time. For now, the origin of the blog title is from a quote. John Trapp, a Puritan, noted that "Unity without verity is not better than conspiracy." We live in an age where many people want to "get along" without any basis in truth (verity). If Trapp is right, and I think he is, then getting along in many contexts today is conspiracy, but the one that concerns me most is the conspiracy of the evangelical church, which has chosen to hide much of what it professes to believe to become acceptable to the culture. There is a tacit conspiracy among evengelical churches, particularly those of a "seeker-sensitive" or "mega-church" mentality, to hide the more offensive parts of the gospel, even though Jesus is called "a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense." Don't read this as me saying we should be offensive, but we cannot deny the truth in order to be liked.

"But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong."